// Table of contents
March 2026 was a month of target revisions across FMCG. After a decade of ambitious pledges — and two years of evidence from the real market — three of the largest global brands published updated commitments for recycled PET content in packaging by 2030. The lessons are instructive — and not all moves are in the direction the “greenwash backlash” narrative would suggest.
Coca-Cola: from 50% to 35%
The most visible change is Coca-Cola lowering its commitment from 50% rPET by 2030 (announced 2022) to 35% rPET by 2030 (announced March 2026). The investor statement gave three reasons:
- Real food-grade rPET availability in key markets (Asia, South America) is growing more slowly than assumed
- Certified food-grade rPET cost rose 40% in 18 months (H2 2024 – H1 2026) vs virgin PET
- Compliance risk from new EFSA/FDA opinions on micro-contaminants excludes some rPET sources
Markets reacted calmly — KO shares dropped 0.4% on the day. JP Morgan and Barclays analysts called the revision pragmatic, though consumer-facing media (NGOs, trade press) criticised the lack of consistency with a decade of earlier statements.
In Europe, where Coca-Cola relies on DRS, the target remains higher — 50% rPET in bottles up to 1 L by 2028. The regional asymmetry is the key story.
Danone: from 30% to 40% (up)
The opposite move at Danone — the French dairy and waters group raised its target from 30% to 40% rPET by 2030. Justification:
- A long-term supply contract with Indorama Ventures (world’s largest rPET producer) secures 180 000 t/year of food-grade material from 2027
- EUR 230 m investment in two captive PCR plants in Spain and Poland (Racibórz starts Q3 2026)
- Danone’s “B Corp + Carbon Positive” strategy demands the highest technically available recycled content
As the first brand in the portfolio, Evian (premium water) has been moved forward to 100% rPET in 2027, two years earlier than the prior pledge. Industry observers read this as “moat building” — positioning ahead of Nestlé Waters and Coca-Cola Dasani.
Unilever: unchanged — with a regional twist
Unilever maintains 25% recycled content across all plastics by 2025 (nearly achieved — 24.1% in 2025) and 50% by 2030. The March 2026 statement, however, elevates food-grade rPET for beverages to a priority track — admitting that previous commitments were over-optimistic.
For the first time Unilever published a regional breakdown: Europe + EMEA to reach 60% recycled content by 2030, North America 45%, Asia-Pacific 30%. The split is more honest — it reflects real feedstock availability and collection infrastructure.
What the three approaches share
Despite the surface differences (lower, higher, regionalised), the three converge on three strategic lessons:
- Regional differentiation over a single global percentage. The “50% globally by 2030” decade is over. Each region now has its own target tuned to local DRS/EPR/collection reality.
- Vertical integration or long-term contracts. Danone is buying its own PCR plant. Coca-Cola has 5-year contracts with Veolia and Indorama. Unilever invested in Mr. Green Africa (PCR hub in Kenya). The spot market is no longer sufficient for volumes above 50 000 t/year.
- Food-grade is the bottleneck. Recycled content for non-food packaging is easy to scale. The bottleneck is specifically food-grade: EFSA-approved feedstock availability, SSP (solid state polycondensation) capacity, and certification costs cap the pace.
Implications for mid-sized FMCG
For mid-sized brands (10 000 – 100 000 t of PET packaging per year):
- Don’t wait for the spot market. Large players have already locked in 3-year forward contracts. In 2027–2028 spot supply will be even tighter.
- Be realistic about targets. 50% rPET by 2028 is very hard for a mid-sized FMCG today. 30% by 2028 + a path to 50% by 2032 is realistic and credible.
- Monitor regional supply differentials. Europe (with DRS) currently has a food-grade rPET surplus. Poland exports about 40 000 t/year to Germany. This trend accelerates in 2027.
Historical context
A decade ago rPET content in major-brand beverage bottles was below 3%. Today the European average is 22%, and the most ambitious brands (Evian, Perrier, Acqua Panna) reach 100%. The pace of change is real — lowering some public pledges does not mean rolling back, it means more honest scheduling of an ongoing transformation.
2026 may be the year corporate decks stop promising what “looks good in the ESG report” and start communicating what is actually deliverable. For the food-grade rPET industry that is a healthy shift.